Difference between revisions of "CVS vs SVN"

From ScummVM :: Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Added svn-book link)
Line 20: Line 20:
 
=== Contra CVS ===
 
=== Contra CVS ===
 
* No support for versioned renames/moves (CVS repos hackery is not even remotely a replacement): Fingolfin
 
* No support for versioned renames/moves (CVS repos hackery is not even remotely a replacement): Fingolfin
 +
 +
=== See Also ===
 +
* [http://svnbook.red-bean.com/en/1.1/apa.html Subversion for CVS Users] - Lists the major differences. Taken from the svn book

Revision as of 17:04, 20 January 2006

On this page, we are trying to collect argument pro and contra both staying with CVS, and switching to CVS. Behind each "argument" is a list of people who agree that this particular argument is valid. We currently have no other realistic choices (since SF.net offers us exactly those two), so I am not comparing more systems here.


Pro Subversion

  • Support for versioned renames/moves (impossible with CVS): Fingolfin
  • Overall revision number makes build versioning and regression testing much easier: Ender
  • Atomic commits: Fingolfin
  • Intuitive (directory-based) branching and tagging.
  • Easier hook scripts (pre/post commit, etc): SumthinWicked (I use it for Doxygen after commits)
  • Prevents accidental committing of conflicted files.

Pro CVS

  • Lots of people know how to use it: Fingolfin
  • Lots of documentation available: Fingolfin


Contra Subversion

  •  ?

Contra CVS

  • No support for versioned renames/moves (CVS repos hackery is not even remotely a replacement): Fingolfin

See Also