Talk:Small Devices Backend
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Revision as of 12:09, 18 January 2006 by JoostP ("Splash screen (most of ports have it, so it could be unified)")
- Could use existing code from https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1325302&group_id=37116&atid=418822 -- SumthinWicked 22:28, 10 Dec 2005 (UTC)
- Maybe we should name it Limited Devices Backend, as some devices like PS2 are hardly small? -- SumthinWicked 22:28, 10 Dec 2005 (UTC)
- Name aside ;) how far down do we need to go? When you start to break oSystem down more and more like this youâ€™re treading a fine line from creating a sub-set (with defined limits) and extending the whole backend into bloat territory (the old adage of all things for all people). A lot of this could benefit any platform, PS2, why not XBOX, older PCâ€™s etc. etc. - Still, that aside I think some abstraction for more â€˜lightweightâ€™ devices is a very good idea (as I have for a long time). I believe the SDL backend would be the ideal starting place for this and some global defines to keep this out of the main code are a must. Maybe just some common APIâ€™s for things like virtual keyboards, splash screens etc. slipped into a sub-set of oSystem are the ideal starting point. Under the banner of â€˜lightweightâ€™ devices. Add more of this concept in as the framework starts to take shape. I guess it has to start somewhere. -- DJWillis 20:58, 14 Jan 2006
"Splash screen (most of ports have it, so it could be unified)"
What's a "splash screen" in this context? I don't remember ever seeing a splash-screen (as I know it, atleast) in a ScummVM port.