Difference between revisions of "Talk:User Manual/Installing ScummVM"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (First steps section: add comment) |
m (Add increment for answer on First steps section) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
What should the "first steps" section contain? All the simple stuff (adding a game and running it) is already in the "Running and Using" section, so I can't see what should be in "first steps" at all... [[User:Spookypeanut|Spookypeanut]] 00:31, 6 December 2007 (CET) | What should the "first steps" section contain? All the simple stuff (adding a game and running it) is already in the "Running and Using" section, so I can't see what should be in "first steps" at all... [[User:Spookypeanut|Spookypeanut]] 00:31, 6 December 2007 (CET) | ||
I have added a link to the "Adding a game" (in the "Running and Using" section) section for now. It has a nice step by step description of the first steps to play a game. An alternative would be to remove the "First steps" section on this page. [[User:Criezy|Criezy]] 22:40, 5 March 2009 (GMT) | :I have added a link to the "Adding a game" (in the "Running and Using" section) section for now. It has a nice step by step description of the first steps to play a game. An alternative would be to remove the "First steps" section on this page. [[User:Criezy|Criezy]] 22:40, 5 March 2009 (GMT) | ||
== Alphabetizing == | == Alphabetizing == | ||
Revision as of 10:46, 7 March 2009
First steps section
What should the "first steps" section contain? All the simple stuff (adding a game and running it) is already in the "Running and Using" section, so I can't see what should be in "first steps" at all... Spookypeanut 00:31, 6 December 2007 (CET)
- I have added a link to the "Adding a game" (in the "Running and Using" section) section for now. It has a nice step by step description of the first steps to play a game. An alternative would be to remove the "First steps" section on this page. Criezy 22:40, 5 March 2009 (GMT)
Alphabetizing
I've been alphabetizing the lists in this section. Hope this doesn't step on any toes, but then that's why wiki is versioned, so we can go back if we need to, right? ;-) Anyway, I've been keeping to the form "big three" (in the order unix, windows, mac) then alphabetized list. What do people think of this? Also, when UNIX is split (into debian, red hat, etc), should it still be at the top? Spookypeanut 01:05, 10 January 2008 (CET)