960
edits
m (Comment on backend maintainers) |
|||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
Should the packagers (does that word exists?) be listed in the "port status" template box for each platform? Currently only the backend maintainer(s) are listed. [[User:Criezy|Criezy]] 23:16, 3 September 2009 (UTC) | Should the packagers (does that word exists?) be listed in the "port status" template box for each platform? Currently only the backend maintainer(s) are listed. [[User:Criezy|Criezy]] 23:16, 3 September 2009 (UTC) | ||
: I think it makes a lot of sense, since there are several ports that use the same backends, both backend maintainers and packagers should be credited. I'll add that field. [[User:Jvprat|jvprat]] 19:01, 5 May 2010 (UTC) | |||
Any news about cleaning this page? A way to synchronize both the downloads page and this could be nice. I updated the references to OS/2, as it got an 1.1.1 port :) [[User:Timofonic|Timofonic]] 12:11, 5 May 2010 (UTC) | Any news about cleaning this page? A way to synchronize both the downloads page and this could be nice. I updated the references to OS/2, as it got an 1.1.1 port :) [[User:Timofonic|Timofonic]] 12:11, 5 May 2010 (UTC) |
edits