306
edits
Difference between revisions of "Talk:Platforms"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
no edit summary
Spookypeanut (talk | contribs) |
Spookypeanut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
We should extend/unify all platform pages to a degree, I think. Besides the "port status" template box, it would be nice if each port page contained at least three sections: A short "about" section which briefly describes the port (using a custom backend, or just a recompiled version using SDL?); an "Installation" section; and an "external resources" section. Additional content (including port specific FAQs, list of supported devices etc.) are welcome, too, of course. [[User:Fingolfin|Fingolfin]] 12:49, 18 December 2007 (CET) | We should extend/unify all platform pages to a degree, I think. Besides the "port status" template box, it would be nice if each port page contained at least three sections: A short "about" section which briefly describes the port (using a custom backend, or just a recompiled version using SDL?); an "Installation" section; and an "external resources" section. Additional content (including port specific FAQs, list of supported devices etc.) are welcome, too, of course. [[User:Fingolfin|Fingolfin]] 12:49, 18 December 2007 (CET) | ||
: Here, here. As I suggested in the Compiling discussion page, I feel all information about a port should be easily accessible from these pages, and that would include making the pages easy to use. | : Here, here. As I suggested in the Compiling discussion page, I feel all information about a port should be easily accessible from these pages, and that would include making the pages easy to use. [[User:Spookypeanut|Spookypeanut]] 22:20, 7 January 2008 (CET) | ||