Difference between revisions of "Talk:Platforms"

Talk:Platforms (view source)

Revision as of 21:20, 7 January 2008

63 bytes added , 21:20, 7 January 2008

no edit summary

Spookypeanut

306

edits

Revision as of 21:20, 7 January 2008 (view source) Spookypeanut (talk \| contribs) ← Older edit		Revision as of 21:20, 7 January 2008 (view source) Spookypeanut (talk \| contribs) Newer edit →
Line 3:		Line 3:

	We should extend/unify all platform pages to a degree, I think. Besides the "port status" template box, it would be nice if each port page contained at least three sections: A short "about" section which briefly describes the port (using a custom backend, or just a recompiled version using SDL?); an "Installation" section; and an "external resources" section. Additional content (including port specific FAQs, list of supported devices etc.) are welcome, too, of course. [[User:Fingolfin\|Fingolfin]] 12:49, 18 December 2007 (CET)		We should extend/unify all platform pages to a degree, I think. Besides the "port status" template box, it would be nice if each port page contained at least three sections: A short "about" section which briefly describes the port (using a custom backend, or just a recompiled version using SDL?); an "Installation" section; and an "external resources" section. Additional content (including port specific FAQs, list of supported devices etc.) are welcome, too, of course. [[User:Fingolfin\|Fingolfin]] 12:49, 18 December 2007 (CET)
	: Here, here. As I suggested in the Compiling discussion page, I feel all information about a port should be easily accessible from these pages, and that would include making the pages easy to use.		: Here, here. As I suggested in the Compiling discussion page, I feel all information about a port should be easily accessible from these pages, and that would include making the pages easy to use. [[User:Spookypeanut\|Spookypeanut]] 22:20, 7 January 2008 (CET)