Difference between revisions of "Summer of Code/Application/2009"

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 52: Line 52:
===  Did your organization participate in past GSoCs? If so, please summarize your involvement and the successes and challenges of your participation. ===
===  Did your organization participate in past GSoCs? If so, please summarize your involvement and the successes and challenges of your participation. ===


<span style="color:red">Somebody with a stronger memory plz update these facts. We'll fix the text later</span>
We have participated in the GSoC program two previous years, in 2007 and 2008.


We have participated in the GSoC program last year, in 2007. We had an exciting time during the prep period, had some very good students and some very bad students during the main stretch, and we got some significant results in the end.
In 2007 we had 7 students and 4 mentors in total. Two of our students have been promoted to active, regular developers in the team after having their respective code contributions integrated in the codebase. One other student's code contributions have also been integrated in the mainline. Two more have their code still in development to improve it and make it production-ready, either through optimization or extension and better integration. Two students failed to keep up with the schedule and/or produced inadequate code.


We had 7 students and 4 mentors in total. Two of our students have been promoted to active, regular developers in the team after having their respective code contributions integrated in the codebase. One other student's code contributions have also been integrated in the mainline. Two more have their code still in development to improve it and make it production-ready, either through optimization or extension and better integration. Two students failed to keep up with the schedule and/or produced inadequate code.
Ultimately, aside the valuable contributions the majority of our students achieved, two students failed. In their case, our mentors agree that there wasn't anything more we could do. Their involvement was minimal from the start and that's what we must identify early on, at the application stage.


Ultimately, aside the valuable contributions the majority of our students achieved, two students failed. In their case, our mentors agree that there wasn't anything more we could do. Their involvement was minimal from the start and that's what we must identify early on, at the application stage.
In 2008 we had 6 students and 7 mentors. 5 of our students were so successful that their code is included in the mainline of ScummVM. Our latest release contains code from all of 5. What was even more great is that 4 of the students still continue to contribute to the project.
 
As in 2007, one of the students was a complete failure. Although his mentor helped him so much, up to writing code with him, he still vanished off the earth and never finished his work.


===  If your organization has not previously participated in GSoC, have you applied in the past? If so, for what year(s)? ===
===  If your organization has not previously participated in GSoC, have you applied in the past? If so, for what year(s)? ===

Navigation menu